From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removing dependency to wsock32.lib when compiling code on WIndows |
Date: | 2014-07-15 11:46:27 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzsEwhGaq6nmqNET4sxtZLrv41_1hJWPCnaMdJZmm9zWg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:13 PM, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> From: "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
>
>> You are right, I only though about the MS scripts when working on this
>> patch. Updated patch for a complete cleanup is attached (note I
>> updated manually ./configure for test purposes and did not re-run
>> autoconf).
>
>
> I marked this patch as ready for committer. I confirmed:
I'm pretty sure this is not ready for commiter due to:
> * The binaries can be built with MSVC 2008 Express. I didn't try to build
> on MinGW.
Somebody needs to test it on mingw first :)
That should be an easy test for someone who has a mingw install
around, so better leave it at "needs review" so more people see it and
can run those tests.
> * The regression tests pass ("vcregress check").
>
> However, I wonder if some DLL entries in dlls[] in
> src/interfaces/libpq/win32.c should be removed. winsock.dll should
> definitely be removed, because it is for 16-bit applications. I don't know
> about the rest. Especially, wsock32n.dll and mswsock.dll may also be
> obsolete libraries from their names. Could you look into this and revise
> the patch if possible? But I don't mind if you do so.
I'm with michael about the "scaryness" of touching this. Also, it is
definitely a separate patch if we do...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2014-07-15 11:58:30 | Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins |
Previous Message | Shigeru Hanada | 2014-07-15 11:09:01 | Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API |