Re: fix for typos in "Reliability and the Write-ahead Log"

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:51 AM, gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> patch attached.

What version did you generate that off? It didn't apply cleanly..

Also, I think the change low->row is actually wrong. It applies to all
low level modifications *including* row level modifications. But there
can be other types of records.

I manually rebased it since it was so small, and applied, though. Thanks!

I did note, which I haven't noted before, that that page talks about
the default wal_buffers being 8. That's clearly just wrong, and
somethign that wasn't properly updated when we added autotuning of
wal_buffers, isn't it?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/