From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> |
Cc: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Release versioning inconsistency |
Date: | 2012-06-21 14:19:31 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEznTG3uBMgOJCXy5HFx0zxp9K48EJ6Gh5hakFHzNXd5cA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> wrote:
> 2012/6/20 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>:
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is
>>>> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much
>>>> better to be inconsistent with previous versions)
>>>
>>> Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and
>>> stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final
>>> release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"?
>>
>> That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we
>> named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual
>> release as 9.2.0...
>
>
> May be a symlink could be created just do fit the same pattern that other
> versions do and keeps the actual links (for beta) working.
That we can do - in fact, done.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-06-21 14:25:45 | Re: Pruning the TODO list |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-06-21 14:17:17 | Re: Release versioning inconsistency |