Re: How do we track backpatches?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How do we track backpatches?
Date: 2013-06-19 18:55:25
Message-ID: CABUevEzNJsyx_GP4QHh08bw2FGpAFF4eWp59P-UYKN4BopHUqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>> > I'd imagine having a "CF" entry per release, so after a set of minor
>> > releases, the "CF" is closed.
>>
>> How would we name these?
>>
>> Also, what about patches for beta? Should we have a "beta" CF?
>
> Don't we have the Open Items wiki page for those? Seems to work well
> enough.

Yes. The CF app only tracks things that already have patches. For the
beta, we really need to track things that may not have been fixed - or
that may have been done, just only partially so far.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2013-06-19 18:55:42 Re: Change authentication error message (patch)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-06-19 18:54:27 Re: How do we track backpatches?