Re: pg_regress application_name

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress application_name
Date: 2012-02-18 10:57:19
Message-ID: CABUevEzM+1r8BiLR6hSQV=QMjgRs+BMD+6z997ZbExgBBvhwYw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:47, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I figured it would be good if pg_regress reported its application_name
> as "pg_regress" rather than "psql".  Any objections to the attached
> patch?

Sounds like a good idea to me, +1.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-02-18 11:39:13 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-02-18 10:47:23 pg_regress application_name