From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Stale external URL in doc? |
Date: | 2020-07-09 15:54:53 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzLdo-gp_hG9MPhb4eD=8+=rR9RxJW=hwuS=eL9_e_Pdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:52 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> > As a short term fix we should either a) remove these links completely or
> b)
> > link to archived copies of the pages on archive.org; or c) find a more
> > appropriate pages to link to. A quick search didn't turn up anything I
> would
> > prefer for (c), and I'm not sure what he legality of linking to a cached
> copy
> > is, so I would advocate for (a).
>
> +1. It should have been obvious just from the spelling of this URL that
> it wasn't intended to be a long term stable location. Digging in the
> git history shows we've already updated it twice, and I wonder how many
> changes there were that we didn't notice.
>
> Just reverting bbd3bdba3 seems appropriate to me.
>
+1.
If we want to keep a set of such links, probably the wiki is a better place
as more people can easily fix them there.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2020-07-09 15:57:46 | Re: Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-07-09 15:29:24 | Re: Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? |