From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: feature freeze and beta schedule |
Date: | 2015-05-05 13:57:28 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzGyUpA+B0hDnPR+6mqY=vfwdEqz-4wCRkW9zqoZ3M-YQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > We really need to segregate the two.. By that what I mean is this: I
> > want an "always-open" "bugfix" CF, which allows us to keep track of
> > bugfix patches. Having something about "applies to versions X, Y, Z"
> > would be nice too...
> >
> > /me prods Magnus
>
> I don't really see that as a step forward. Right now there's one
> place to look at for patches that somebody wants me (or someone) to
> pay attention to, and, when time permits, I look at it. Dividing that
> up into two places is not going to make me look at them more
> frequently.
>
Thanks for highlighting that somebody was actually trying to get my
attention in that thread. I missed it :)
Which brings the point - this should be discussed in a separate thread,
really. It's not part of feature freeze or beta schedule... It's more about
process...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sawada Masahiko | 2015-05-05 15:10:33 | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-05 13:47:56 | Re: feature freeze and beta schedule |