From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | José Luis Tallón <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CommitFest App] Feature request -- review e-mail additions |
Date: | 2016-04-06 12:11:10 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzEyLL8Q=KJhARCqyDyTJzA6SiepWyxegH2EU4zO9T=jw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
> > Just wanted to suggest two minor mods to the review e-mails
> > auto-generated by the app:
> >
> > * Prepend a [review] tag to the e-mail subject
> > ... so that e-mails sent to -hackers will read " [HACKERS] [review]
> > <patch title goes here>"
>
> Changing the subject of an email causes Gmail to break the threads, so
> anything in that line should be discouraged. -1 from me. I would be
> happier if the subject of the submission email is kept intact, i.e. not
> use the patch title that was used in commitfest app but use the one in
> the email. These often differ.
>
That's what the code tries to do. It will add a Re: if there isn't one
already, but otherwise should reuse it. At least that's how it's trying to
work - do you have a pointer to an example where it doesn't, so I can
investigate if something is off?
> > * Auto-CC the patch author on this e-mail
> > I guess this should speed up reactions / make communication a bit
> more
> > fluid.
>
> Yes, strong +1 on this.
>
Ok, that should be easy enough to add. I've stuck it on my TODO list and
will try to get it ASAP.
> 3) Have the auto-generated emails insert In-Reply-To headers (and
> perhaps References).
>
It already does. Both. Again, do you have a pointer to where it doesn't?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-04-06 12:11:40 | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Avoid archiving XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS on idle server |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-04-06 12:02:17 | Re: pgsql: Avoid archiving XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS on idle server |