Re: ftp.postgresql.org vs. ftp-archives.postgresql.org

On Friday, November 25, 2011, Dave Page wrote:

> 2011/11/25 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org <javascript:;>>:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 09:55 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> So, should we merge the trees back together, and get rid of
> >> ftp-archives.postgresql.org? I'm +1, fwiw.
> >
> > +1 from me, too. BTW, I'm assuming that we will keep ftp-archives
> > address, so that the links in the archives, etc. won't be broken.
>
> I hadn't considered that, but yes, we can of course.
>
> I'm +1 as well. We *can* measure the load on the archives server, and it's
very low (it seems to peak around 1Mbit/sec, and that's very rare).

But we should probably wait until after we know the load on the new ftp
boxes - just to be on the safe side. Should be easy enough to do it as two
steps, right?

//Magnus

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/