From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |
Date: | 2012-09-04 12:48:06 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEz06d7Q8gxY4ZxacBmwtTWSiqnjHosPHR_CMcNe30TijQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
>>>
>>> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
>>> here.
>
>> We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
>> But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
>> slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
>> going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
>> both on the same bullet point?
>
> Sure, reword it however you want. I've not been paying much attention
> to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.
Done.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-09-04 13:01:13 | pgsql: Change "restoring" to "processing" in message from pg_dump |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-09-04 12:47:51 | pgsql: Mention basebackup-from-slave next to cascading replication |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-09-04 13:01:08 | Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode |
Previous Message | Vik Reykja | 2012-09-04 12:38:41 | 9.2rc1 produces incorrect results |