Re: The purpose of the core team

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The purpose of the core team
Date: 2015-06-11 17:10:06
Message-ID: CABUevEywhHH9q6cY3ZeEQH5qgPSJPD08bqsA_ckP7nn+6R5iLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:

>
> On 06/11/2015 07:12 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>
>> Hopefully this will be helpful to people.
>>>
>>
>> I believe the core team is suffering from a lack of members who are
>> involved in writing, reviewing, and committing patches. Those things
>> are not core functions of the core team, as that charter illustrates.
>>
>
> Bruce: Committer, maintains pg_upgrade and reviews patches here and there.
>
> Magnus: Committer, primary Windows dude and reviews patches here and there.
>

Not sure that's a fair title at this point. Both Andrew and Michael seem to
be doing more of that than me these days, for example. (I do review patches
here and there, but not as much as I'd like)

>
> Peter: Committer, reviews patches not only on -hackers but also -docs
>
> Tom: Enough said
>
> Dave: Committer, agreed that he doesn't do much -hackers work but I
> guarantee you he provides a unique perspective to the rest of his group due
> to his management of PgAdmin and an entire team at EDB.
>

Dave is not and never was a committer on the actual postgresql code - only
on other subprojects.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-06-11 17:11:41 Re: The purpose of the core team
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-06-11 16:56:58 Re: The purpose of the core team