Re: bugs and bug tracking

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bugs and bug tracking
Date: 2015-10-07 19:01:26
Message-ID: CABUevEyqe-4Lsj=F_5RVyoqxP-rr7qb4fYWtSv7ajr5zEA0OwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > I *really* don't like the idea of rewriting the From/To completely to
> > force all mail through a relay and I'm pretty sure that "fix" would be
> > far worse than the problem.
>
> Agreed; but adding a Reply-To: header seems quite reasonable. (Unless
> gmail ignores that, which I wouldn't put past it ...)
>

It does not.

I'm sure there's *some* MUA out there that does, but probably not the big
ones.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-10-07 19:06:50 Re: bugs and bug tracking
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-10-07 18:59:08 Re: bugs and bug tracking