From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fate of pgFoundry |
Date: | 2012-01-12 18:56:57 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEymwycVKMhNZD1_kie73MnOa5ZCe_Z3FMGVEF-0mLXjHQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 19:52, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I've just been informed by the Alvaro that the sysadmin team would like
>> to kill off pgFoundry. I don't blame them.
I'd also to clearify that this is *not* the sysadmin team. The
sysadmin team are not maintaining pgfoundry, and are not involved.
pgfoundry has a separate admin team, who hangs out at
gforge-admins(at)pgfoundry(dot)org(dot) This is a completely different team.
Had it been under the actual sysadmin team, this would've happened
many years ago.
>> However, when we previously had this discussion, there were a list of
>> things to be done in the months leading up to killing off pgFoundry. As
>> far as I know, none of those things were actually done.
> ... like, say, notifying projects and giving them a reasonable
> opportunity to migrate someplace else? AFAIR there has been never been
> any clear statement of intent to shut down pgfoundry, just some vague
> grumblings of annoyance from the admin team.
Dave has been working on a plan, and options and things like that.
He'll be posting details soon.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2012-01-12 19:19:59 | Re: Fate of pgFoundry |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-01-12 18:56:29 | Re: Fate of pgFoundry |