Re: Help: Installing 9.6 breaks local connections to 9.2 on Centos 6.9

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Help: Installing 9.6 breaks local connections to 9.2 on Centos 6.9
Date: 2017-05-16 08:38:40
Message-ID: CABUevEyi11xJFzohzr1NWWnM1H5kGnrKrn8wHd31pS1XjW2D_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 22:35 -0700, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> > https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2409
>
> Not sure whether we should *fix* this or not on RPM side. This may break
> some
> of the existing installations, right?
>
> I'm not objecting, just asking for opinions.
>
>
Changing that in a minor version seems like a *really* bad idea, because
things *will* break. The way it is now it only breaks in case of a major
version upgrade, and there is an easy enough workaround present.

But it should perhaps be more clearly documented somewhere.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Goodson 2017-05-16 11:36:13 Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
Previous Message reem 2017-05-16 08:28:40 database is not accepting commands