Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
Date: 2013-04-15 20:00:27
Message-ID: CABUevEyaP10u6ZYrRb+VHt7LW6+wdiSFj+58HbczrUfhzPYBxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:52:54PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>> > 2ndQuadrant has experienced significant delays in at least 3 cases
>> > also. There is definitely a problem somewhere there.
>>
>> The delay is called "volunteer moderators who have day jobs".
>>
>> > Perhaps we should make all posts wait the same length of time, to
>> > allow reasonable time to decide whether posts are suitable? 72 hours
>> > seems like a reasonable time for this.
>>
>> Who is going to do this strictly time-limited approving?
>
> So it auto-approves after 72 hours? I found this proposal vague.

If anything automatic were to happen after 72 hours, the reasonable
thing would be a rejection.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-04-15 20:10:46 Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-04-15 19:59:18 Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org