| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: New SQL functons pg_backup_in_progress() and pg_backup_start_tim |
| Date: | 2012-06-15 05:52:36 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEyYqWkzoKYbW4j=qMs-UnQTs8ckuUs7GZV8js7XQE4rTg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> New SQL functons pg_backup_in_progress() and pg_backup_start_time()
>
> Darold Gilles, reviewed by Gabriele Bartolini and others, rebased by
> Marco Nenciarini. Stylistic cleanup and OID fixes by me.
How well is the term "on-line exclusive backup" really settled with
people? I wonder if we need to add a specific note to the docs saying
that the function doesn't consider streaming base backups at all, and
that one should refer to pg_stat_replication for info about those? Or
really, should the function be pg_exclusive_backup_in_progress()
perhaps?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-15 12:16:59 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: New SQL functons pg_backup_in_progress() and pg_backup_start_tim |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-06-14 23:03:50 | pgsql: Add more message pluralization |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-06-15 06:23:55 | Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-06-15 05:50:35 | Re: libpq compression |