| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off |
| Date: | 2016-08-17 08:45:19 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEyTftGFgn1Myr9ouEt-MNcb9va1+GfSYAtPmC5rXsrzPg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> wrote:
> >> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only,
> or
> >> back further?
>
> > I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
> > back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN. I don't
> > think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.
>
> I agree with fixing 9.6, but not further back.
>
Good, that pretty much aligns with what I was thinking.
Applied and backpatched to 9.6.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Victor Wagner | 2016-08-17 09:34:37 | Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read |
| Previous Message | Oskari Saarenmaa | 2016-08-17 07:58:09 | Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read |