From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02 |
Date: | 2015-04-28 16:10:31 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEyMhkXP46JU3-9V7yqZ=yyGi7PhM3k43G6jWPW6CY98-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Michael Paquier <
> michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > @Magnus: having the possibility to mark a patch as "returned with
>> > feedback" without bumping it to the next CF automatically would be
>> > cool to being moving on.
>> Meh. "cool to have to help moving on".
>>
>>
> Yeah, it's at the top of my list of priorities once I get some time to
> spend on community stuff. Hopefully I can get around to it next week. There
> is a small chance I can do it before then, but it is indeed small...
>
My apologies for that being delayed even longe rthan that. I've finally
pushed the changes that:
* Renames the current "returned with feedback" to "moved to next cf"
* Adds a new status, "returned with feedback", that is the same as
"rejected" in everything except the label (meaning it closes the patch out,
but does *not* move it to the next CF).
This was at least my understanding of the consensus :)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-04-28 16:13:10 | Re: WIP: multivariate statistics / proof of concept |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-04-28 16:09:39 | Re: WIP: multivariate statistics / proof of concept |