From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
Date: | 2012-04-18 05:30:22 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEyKcBxCoj7shBUXEx1hBh0qjqb1EDopY54czixM-nOtFw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:30, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because
>>> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*...
>
>> I think this is a point worth serious thought.
>
> Indeed. The only one I've got extensive experience with is Bugzilla
> (because Red Hat uses it) and I do cordially hate it. At least some
> of that is due to bureaucratic practices RH has evolved, like cloning
> bugs N times for N affected releases, but I think the tool encourages
> such things. So when I read Andrew's recent suggestion that we use
> Bugzilla, my immediate reaction was "egad, can't we do better?".
> Maybe we can't :-(.
Personally, I'd say we *already* do better than that...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-04-18 05:34:00 | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-18 05:21:40 | Re: 9.3 Pre-proposal: Range Merge Join |