Re: "unexpected EOF" messages

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I had a request from a customer asking if we could make a switch to
>>> specifically disable the "unexpected EOF" message that fills lots of
>>> peoples logs.
>
>> Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple
>> user-specified message types.
>
> I agree with Simon --- a disable for that specific message seems like a
> kluge, and an ugly one at that.  (The right solution for this customer
> is to fix their broken application.)  But a generic filter capability
> might be useful enough to justify its keep.

Are you thinking basically "regexp against the main text", or
something else, when you say "generic filter capacity"?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/