Re: Retiring legacyurls

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 3:51 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 10/11/18 5:56 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:45 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net
> > <mailto:magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>> wrote:
> >
> > We have a piece of code in legacyurls.py in the website project that
> > handles URLs that are from the old website. And by old website I
> > don't mean the one from half a year ago, I mean the one from 10
> > years ago.
> >
> > This one handles:
> > /about/press/presskit/<ver>.html.<language>
>
> This one gave me momentary panic as we are a week away from the release
> and I just assembled the presskit, but then I noticed that this does not
> follow the current format at all, hence the whole "legacy" bit, so as
> long as it does not break the release work, +1 for dropping.
>
> > /about/license -> /about/licence
> >
> > Of those I suggest we keep the license redirect (some people
> > consider American English not to be legacy after all), but nuke the
> > rest.
>
> +1 to keeping this; I've seen people linking to the US spelling of this.
>
> >
> > Thoughts? Any of them worthy of saving? Or does somebody actually
> > think it's worth investing the work to track exactly how much that
> > old stuff is used?
> >
> >
> > Nah - drop 'em all.
>
> *Drop them all except the /about/license
>
> Thanks for reviewing all of this!
>

Pushed.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>