| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release versioning inconsistency |
| Date: | 2012-06-20 11:26:20 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEyC0dTiK0NkZNscYCN-cKEypnKSm66NXrAvzGjtpn=WGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is
>> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much
>> better to be inconsistent with previous versions)
>
> Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and
> stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final
> release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"?
That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we
named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual
release as 9.2.0...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dickson S. Guedes | 2012-06-20 11:35:05 | Re: Release versioning inconsistency |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-06-20 11:19:30 | Re: WAL format changes |