From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups |
Date: | 2015-11-26 13:53:13 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEy7roL3RD=OVP1fX+4vnKWRWh8=ibz4kodumn=ndhTqdA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I'm only talking about the actual value in pg_stat_replication here, not
> > what we are using internally. These are two different things of course -
> > let's keep them separate for now. In pg_stat_replication, we explicitly
> > check for InvalidXLogRecPtr and then explicitly set the resulting value
> to
> > NULL in the SQL return.
>
> No objections from here. I guess you already have a patch?
>
Well, no, because I haven't figured out which way is the logical one - make
them all return NULL or make them all return 0/0...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2015-11-26 14:19:07 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-11-26 12:59:52 | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |