Re: Problem with archives -- mail gets lost

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with archives -- mail gets lost
Date: 2015-10-12 08:15:10
Message-ID: CABUevEy2vnzZjhqjLm314u2a_Qw3Cv2hTHk_g_oK+Di3cr413g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Peter Geoghegan <
peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> This is a dead link, but should link to a post to pgsql-hackers sent a
> little while ago:
>
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZScpWzQ-7EJC77vwqzZ1GO8GNmURQ1QqDQ3wRn7AbW1Cg@mail.gmail.com
>
> I can even see my mail listed here, with a dead link to above:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers/since/201510120000/
>
> The subject of the mail is "INSERT ... ON CONFLICT documentation
> clean-up patch". What's up with this?
>

That link works fine for me.

Is there any chance that you actually tried navigating to that link
*before* the mail actually showed up on the list in your second page? It's
normal with a short delay (usually seconds) after the email gets to
majordomo before it's in the archives. At that point it should not be
visible on either of those two links, but if you hit the first link it
would cache the 404 response for a while. Once the email arrived, the
second link would be refreshed but not the first once (since at the time
you got to the first link initially, we did not know which thread to
expire, as we had not seen the mail yet).

Could that be the explanation?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Szymon Lipiński 2015-10-12 08:40:11 Re: Problem with archives -- mail gets lost
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-10-12 01:43:11 Problem with archives -- mail gets lost