Re: Use of term hostaddrs for multiple hostaddr values

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 1/20/18 17:39, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Michael Paquier <
> michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> >> wrote:
> >> These are both clear bugs, and the docs one should definitely be both
> >> applied and backpatched.
> >>
> >> How much do we care about the error message when it comes to
> backpatching?
> >> Maybe we should leave that one to 11 only, to avoid breaking that, as
> the
> >> way it's written it's actually less wrong there.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks for your input!
> >
> > Applying the error message portion only on HEAD is a good plan, there is
> > no point to make the life of translaters unnecessary painful.
>
> I would backpatch both. The updated error message is arguably easier to
> translate.
>

Fair enough. And since you do the translation merging at least, I'll go
with that.

Thus, applied and backpatched to 10.

Thanks!

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>