| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp" <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PROXY protocol support |
| Date: | 2021-03-04 20:47:10 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevExeQdrxtR=OiP3odDPh2KFR0+MLfE=t=-JaqbjX0t3Upg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:45 PM Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 10:42 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Is there any formal specification for the "a protocol common and very
> > light weight in proxies"?
>
> See
>
> https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
Yeah, it's currently in one of the comments, but should probably be
added to the docs side as well.
And yes tests :) Probably not a regression test, but some level of tap
testing should definitely be added. We'll just have to find a way to
do that without making haproxy a dependency to run the tests :)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-03-04 20:48:59 | Re: CI/windows docker vs "am a service" autodetection on windows |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2021-03-04 20:45:33 | Re: PROXY protocol support |