From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery |
Date: | 2022-04-05 14:58:43 |
Message-ID: | CABUevExZRzVybySvBo=R_Q57Y_sxRbs34+CW+u5xROu27kbyXQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:54 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:41 AM Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> > I know it's been 8 years, but I still think it would be a useful note
> > to add to the docs.
>
Many points for bringing that one back :)
Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects.
>
> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over
> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure
> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear.
>
Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're
referring to?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-05 15:01:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-05 14:54:30 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-05 15:01:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-05 14:54:30 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery |