| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mahmoud Hakeem-Habeeb <Mahmoud(dot)hakeem(dot)habeeb(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Delay streaming replication using a paramter |
| Date: | 2012-10-31 16:54:28 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevExZM=5f3yRLeNGSZBXntSA3ptqEM8pXEL-_RbTSGqPw1A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Mahmoud Hakeem-Habeeb <
Mahmoud(dot)hakeem(dot)habeeb(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Firstly is it possible for me to delay streaming replication using
>
> wal_sender_delay
>
> or any other parameter.
>
No, you can't do delayed replication on streaming. You can do it if you use
file based replication only.
> Secondly is it possible or under what circumstance will a slave
> get corrupted from the master either a table of a database.
>
> This is the reason i want to find out if it is possible to delay
> replication incase of any corruption of data not propagating to the slave.
>
I don't understand this question, so I can't answer it. Sorry.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Edson Richter | 2012-10-31 17:32:19 | dropdb breaks replication? |
| Previous Message | Christian Hammers | 2012-10-31 16:21:31 | When do archived WAL files gets removed after wal_keep_segments changed? |