From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgresql.conf archive_command example |
Date: | 2011-09-02 17:16:35 |
Message-ID: | CABUevExYgb5OiCvuN7NDVZFey-uUWG2TiEDFi-vfP6bjZZqdNw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 19:13, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> For example, you might want to copy the archives to more than one
>> place for safety reasons.
>
> We've never felt that the way to do that was to put the logic for it
> in the archive script -- we archive to a local directory and set up
> rsync tasks on cron to distribute it. Otherwise you might not
> archive to one target if the other is down, or might have trouble
> catching up with a target when it comes back from being down.
Archiving it locally will give you a window of lost data if you crash.
The point being - different people have different requirements, which
is one thing our currently solution is very good at catering to - the
downside being lots of work. I don't think dumbing down the system is
a good idea - but shipping an example script probably is.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-09-02 17:52:40 | WAL "low watermark" during base backup |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-09-02 17:13:46 | Re: postgresql.conf archive_command example |