Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures vs shared relations

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures vs shared relations
Date: 2025-03-30 15:03:06
Message-ID: CABUevExTfbcffnysJpWhVA0uJ6absQu_9Qbg-69hWW54xQsRXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 7:09 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2025-03-29 13:17:44 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2025-03-28 13:47:16 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Attached is a fix for the issue.
> >
> > I plan to push this fix soon, unless somebody protests...
>
> And done.
>

Hi!

Sorry to get into this thread a bit late. Just to let you know that now
that I'm caught up, I do agree it looks right.

And - thanks for handling this!

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-03-30 16:10:17 Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans
Previous Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-03-30 14:00:45 Re: Using read stream in autoprewarm