From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | zb <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review] |
Date: | 2012-10-23 15:08:56 |
Message-ID: | CABUevExJT7z99VNR=BEKQmRCKBfZsO=-ceRxs3H8ioOroMMPLA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 23, 2012 4:52 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
>
> > >>Also, the check for conflict between -R and -x/-X is now removed.
> >
> > The documentation for option -R has changed to reflect this and
> > there is no different error code 2 now: it would make the behaviour
> > inconsistent between -Fp and -Ft.
> >
> > >>>The PQconninfo patch is also attached but didn't change since the
last mail.
>
> Magnus,
>
> This patch is all yours to handle. I'm guessing nothing will happen
> until pgconf.eu is done and over, but hopefully you can share a few
> beers with Zoltan over the whole subject (and maybe with Peter about the
> PQconninfo stuff?)
>
> I'm not closing this just yet, but if you're not able to handle this
> soon, maybe it'd be better to punt it to the November commitfest.
It's on my to do list for when I get back, but correct, won't get to it
until after the conference.
/Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-23 15:25:40 | Re: Re: proposal and patch : support INSERT INTO...RETURNING with partitioned table using rule |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-23 15:05:34 | Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication |