Re: "0.0" version string in URLs

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "0.0" version string in URLs
Date: 2014-05-28 17:53:40
Message-ID: CABUevEx7RbRRQiK-RXpPUozzLqmBKwo0PZBpZvC-bk4ESEkxaw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> I happened to be googling for "postgresql 9.4 release notes", and the
> first result for me was this link:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/0.0/static/index.html
>
> which apparently works and appears to have the same content as this
> URL with a more reasonable version identifier:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/index.html
>
> IMO it's not great that we're propagating "0.0" version-string-URLs,
> apparently in some way that Google happily picks up on. Is there a
> prominent link to a /0.0/ URL somewhere in the postgresql.org space,
> or are we redirecting some pages to a version 0.0?
>

Wow, I wonder how they got to that one. We certainly *shouldn't* be linking
to that anywhere, but 0.0 is the internal one that's used for "devel" docs.
But they should always be accessed as /devel/.

I've pushed a fix that gives a 404 on /0.0/. If there is actually a link
pointing there, someone will tell us soon :)

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2014-05-29 12:38:24 postgresql.org is returning forbidden
Previous Message Josh Kupershmidt 2014-05-28 16:56:23 "0.0" version string in URLs