From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reconstructing old threads fun |
Date: | 2013-10-24 08:14:31 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEx=n8tKhbDcHuK8EYZCG8BJ1jPRaWs8u9MZZbZD2Znr_g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I just noticed a glitch in the algorithms for thread reconstruction.
> See this thread:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1290091189-sup-9738(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org
>
> in which I just found that the archives were incomplete. I had the
> missing emails (since I was CCed), so I thought it'd be good to have
> them in the public archive. So I bounced them to pgsql-admin.
>
> If you open the initial email, the thread dropdown doesn't list the
> added emails. If you follow the "response" links at the bottom, you
> won't reach the added emails. However, if you open the "flat" view,
> they will definitely be there.
>
> Is this something that would manifest in other cases when emails in the
> middle of a thread get added later than some later ones? This is not a
> common situation, but it might happen if some emails in the middle are
> moderated and later ones are not.
That sounds more like a cache invalidation issue. Since I don't know
exactly which of the emails had the problem - if you go back now, has
it by any chance resolved itself already? AFAICT there's at least the
same *number* of messages in the two lists now...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-10-24 13:34:08 | Re: reconstructing old threads fun |
Previous Message | Michael Alan Brewer | 2013-10-23 21:57:58 | Re: [pgsql-www] freecode.com |