Re: reconstructing old threads fun

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reconstructing old threads fun
Date: 2013-10-24 08:14:31
Message-ID: CABUevEx=n8tKhbDcHuK8EYZCG8BJ1jPRaWs8u9MZZbZD2Znr_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I just noticed a glitch in the algorithms for thread reconstruction.
> See this thread:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1290091189-sup-9738(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org
>
> in which I just found that the archives were incomplete. I had the
> missing emails (since I was CCed), so I thought it'd be good to have
> them in the public archive. So I bounced them to pgsql-admin.
>
> If you open the initial email, the thread dropdown doesn't list the
> added emails. If you follow the "response" links at the bottom, you
> won't reach the added emails. However, if you open the "flat" view,
> they will definitely be there.
>
> Is this something that would manifest in other cases when emails in the
> middle of a thread get added later than some later ones? This is not a
> common situation, but it might happen if some emails in the middle are
> moderated and later ones are not.

That sounds more like a cache invalidation issue. Since I don't know
exactly which of the emails had the problem - if you go back now, has
it by any chance resolved itself already? AFAICT there's at least the
same *number* of messages in the two lists now...

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-10-24 13:34:08 Re: reconstructing old threads fun
Previous Message Michael Alan Brewer 2013-10-23 21:57:58 Re: [pgsql-www] freecode.com