Re: using a postgres table as a multi-writer multi-updater queue

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: George Neuner <gneuner2(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: using a postgres table as a multi-writer multi-updater queue
Date: 2015-11-29 17:43:29
Message-ID: CABUevEwtr+PQ8U1WLSo3x8TEseH8gu8CNcecMOSOQnURZh9Kxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Nov 29, 2015 18:34, "George Neuner" <gneuner2(at)comcast(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 05:04:42 -0500, "Steve Petrie, P.Eng."
> <apetrie(at)aspetrie(dot)net> wrote:
>
> >"George Neuner" <gneuner2(at)comcast(dot)net> wrote in message
> >news:kaed5btl92qr4v8ndevlgtv0f28qaaeju7(at)4ax(dot)com(dot)(dot)(dot)
> >
> >> My vote for an email client would be Thunderbird. It runs on XP or
> >> higher and you can import Outlook's PST files so as to keep your mail
> >> archives. Importing PST files directly requires Outlook be available
> >> on the same system [there is also a less friendly way to do it via EML
> >> files exported from Outlook where Outlook is not on the same system].
> >>
> >
> >It's a common misconception that MS Outlook Express is compatible with MS
> >Outlook. But in fact the two products are architecturally unrelated.
>
> My understanding was that OE was based on the old (Win9x) Outlook. I
> know it isn't the same as the "enterprise" version.

This is fantastically of topic but no, it was not. OE was based on the old
"Internet mail and news". The actual outlook product has always been
separate.

/Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-29 17:54:54 Re: JSONB performance enhancement for 9.6
Previous Message George Neuner 2015-11-29 17:31:19 Re: using a postgres table as a multi-writer multi-updater queue