| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Validate page level checksums in base backups |
| Date: | 2018-04-04 17:25:11 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEwrCF7TzAyD=4WPfTyzH+5xaFYf+-=ATW58XLi7b4dURA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
> Michael Banck wrote:
>
> > However, the pg_basebackup testsuite takes up 800+ MB to run,
>
> Uh, you're right. This seems a bit over the top. Can we reduce that
> without losing coverage? We've gone great lengths to avoid large
> amounts of data in tests elsewhere.
>
That didn't come out of this patch, right? This is a pre-existing issue?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Banck | 2018-04-04 18:22:48 | Re: pgsql: Validate page level checksums in base backups |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-04-04 17:16:50 | Re: pgsql: Optimize btree insertions for common case of increasing values |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2018-04-04 17:31:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
| Previous Message | Gasper Zejn | 2018-04-04 17:23:58 | Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS |