From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Adam Scott <adam(dot)c(dot)scott(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch: New field in frmMain statusbar |
Date: | 2015-09-15 11:14:52 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwmoneWk9-n1uJeTxtr7KYzHBmbWEfGwN0Uwx+fR0T4=A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> wrote:
> > The part that changed is just the one that added db1 and db2, right?
>
> It's the server display name *and* the database name, so to give a
> (redacted) example from my machine, I would have:
>
> aws-ap-southeast-1b.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com (aws-ap-southeast-1b.
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com:5432):postgres
>
> Which as you can see is quite long.
>
I thought the point of display names was to have them nice and short :)
I've certainly never used displaynames that are that long.
Yes, I totally see with names like that it becomes annoying, and certainly
not easy to parse. Perhaps what we really shoul dhave is just displayname +
databasename, and exclude the actual hostname?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2015-09-15 11:20:34 | Re: Patch: New field in frmMain statusbar |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2015-09-15 08:55:43 | Re: Patch: New field in frmMain statusbar |