From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: nested queries vs. pg_stat_activity |
Date: | 2020-08-10 20:09:41 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwkC7-yJEOzJ9pP-S7F2oqmo8phiA6seDkkxpopPO+bQg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:51 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:51 PM legrand legrand
> <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > An other solution is to expose nested queryid, and to join it with
> pg_stat_statements.
> > Actual development trying to add queryid to pg_stat_activity isn't
> helpfull, because it is only exposing top level one.
> > Extension pg_stat_sql_plans (github) propose a function called
> pg_backend_queryid(pid),
> > that gives the expected queryid (that is stored in shared memory for
> each backend) ...
>
> That'd help people using pg_stat_statements, but not others.
>
Would it even solve the problem for them? pg_stat_statements collects
aggregate stats and not a view of what's happening right now -- so it'd be
mixing two different types of values. And it would get worse if the same
thing is executed multiple times concurrently.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-08-10 20:20:21 | Re: Allow some recovery parameters to be changed with reload |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-08-10 19:51:03 | Re: nested queries vs. pg_stat_activity |