| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup option for handling symlinks |
| Date: | 2012-01-08 21:22:08 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEwdxKbHDW25WSOoXgcjGwQAJTwt==5KUbsvC1nJ0Zz5yA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 21:53, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I've recently had a possible need for telling pg_basebackup how to
> handle symlinks in the remote data directory, instead of ignoring them,
> which is what currently happens. Possible options were recreating the
> symlink locally (pointing to a file on the local system) or copying the
> file the symlink points to. This is mainly useful in scenarios where
> configuration files are symlinked from the data directory. Has anyone
> else had the need for this? Is it worth pursuing?
Yes.
I came up to the same issue though - in one case it would've been best
to copy the link, in the other case it would've been best to copy the
contents of the file :S Couldn't decide which was most important...
Maybe a switch would be needed?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-01-08 21:32:41 | Re: run check constraints only when affected columns are changed? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-01-08 20:53:01 | pg_basebackup option for handling symlinks |