Re: pg_basebackup --wal-method=fetch

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup --wal-method=fetch
Date: 2024-02-09 14:19:35
Message-ID: CABUevEwb3Gj9osaR9_PCrmYtjv+CMsEWXhoj3S5=TmCPLkhPNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 12:11 AM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 5:21 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> * Ron Johnson (ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>>
>> > The word "streaming".
>> > Should be "But isn't streaming the whole purpose of pg_basebackup"?
>>
>> I'm a bit confused on this point still as if the whole purpose of
>> pg_basebackup is to be streaming ... then we should be defaulting to
>> fetch mode still?
>
>
> No. Since I thought streaming is the whole purpose of pg_basebackup, I questioned the utility of every other method except --wal-method=streaming.

Well, "fetch" mode also does streaming... It just does streaming at
the end instead of parallel. So I guess one could argue the names
chosen are wrong, and should be named something like "parallel" and
"sequential". But I think the ship on renaming that has sailed a long
time ago...

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Barron 2024-02-09 17:00:57 upgrade questions
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2024-02-08 23:10:38 Re: pg_basebackup --wal-method=fetch