Re: PostgreSQL website redesign

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 16:38, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 16:37, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of mié nov 23 12:28:31 -0300 2011:
>>> On 11/19/2011 09:29 AM, damien clochard wrote:
>>> > c/ Sorry but I'm not a huge fan of the Postgres Open website :-/ It's
>>> > full of HTML and CSS errors everywhere. The meta tags are pretty poor.
>>> > Basic files like sitemap.xml or robots.txt are missing. There's no
>>> > favicon either....  On what basis is this an "excellent job" ?
>>> >
>>>
>>> The Postgres Open site is built on top of some Django code from another
>>> conference, and it turned out to be a nightmare to work with.
>>
>> Uh, the new Postgres site is also Django ... is this a bad sign?
>
> No, it has nothing to do with django, and everything to do with how
> the templates are set up.

Pressed send to early.

FWIW,the django based version of the postgres site is *more* standards
compliant and cleaner than the old one. At least according to Thom,
and he tends to notice such things.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/