From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Out-of-policy Planet post? |
Date: | 2012-10-08 18:57:02 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEw_n08-0ABGHoFM-tAmHs8dquKsFMRicOL0hUVeFMGthA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> WWW,
>>
>> "8 New Oracle compatibility features in EnterpriseDB PPAS 9.2 Beta"
>>
>> Last I checked, the end result of discussion on this list was that no
>> blogging about proprietary forks of PostgreSQL was permitted on Planet.
>> It's a policy I disagreed with, but if that's our policy, we should
>> follow it.
>>
>> Since Ras seems to be a new blogger, someone from WWW should just inform
>> him of the policy and remove the post.
>
> Yes, I assumed someone had already done that, so I didn't say anything,
> but I agree.
Does it actually violate the policy though? It's pretty darn vague...
I agree it's very much a borderline so somebody should probably send
him a warning about it, but I'm not sure it's actually a strict
violation?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-10-08 19:03:40 | Re: Out-of-policy Planet post? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-10-08 18:16:36 | Re: Out-of-policy Planet post? |