Re: relocating the server's backup manifest code

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: relocating the server's backup manifest code
Date: 2020-04-18 16:33:08
Message-ID: CABUevEwV43HW6U_A8BcTS3Zpzo3bjiFS+m_J8sw0zZs3au88wQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 5:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Despite the fact that we are after feature freeze, I think it would be
> > a good idea to commit this to PG 13. It could be saved for PG 14, but
> > that will make future back-patching substantially harder. Also, a
> > patch that's just moving code is pretty low-risk.
>
> +1 in principle --- I didn't read the patch though.
>

Same here, +1 in principle. This is not a new feature, this is "polishing a
feature that was added in 13", and doing so now will save a lot of work
down the road vs doing it later.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Coleman 2020-04-18 18:23:25 Re: sqlsmith crash incremental sort
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-18 16:00:19 Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority