From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage |
Date: | 2011-08-16 09:51:33 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwTc0uaRxEFr-LVDho9KUmWZMW_8hv=SghwJd9yUtPM0w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 13:50, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in
>> StandbyReplyMessage *except* for the timestamp when the message was
>> generated. On an active system this is not all that interesting, but
>> on a mostly idle system that allows the monitoring to react faster
>> than the timeout that actually kicks the other end off - and could be
>> useful in manual debugging scenarios. Any particular reason why this
>> was not exposed as it's own column?
>
> I wondered the same thing. Sounds like a good idea.
I can go do that. Care to argue^Wbikeshed for a specific name?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anssi Kääriäinen | 2011-08-16 10:24:25 | Re: index-only scans |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-08-16 09:35:10 | Re: some missing internationalization in pg_basebackup |