From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint |
Date: | 2017-03-31 06:59:18 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwHSy=oaimevRryg=sFC-0CSkyksFFt85BCM-uCAgfDsA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 27.02.2017, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Is there an argument for back-patching this?
> >
> >
> > Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.
> >
> >
> > I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take
> > your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?
>
> I've checked back into this thread, and there seems to be a +1 from Tom
> and a +(0.5-1) from Simon for backpatching, and no obvious -1s. Did you
> decide against it in the end, or is this still an open item?
No, I plan to work on it, so it's still an open item. I've been backlogged
with other things, but I will try to get too it soon.
(This also includes considering Jeff's note)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-03-31 07:01:17 | Re: Typo in libpq |
Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-03-31 06:50:28 | Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode |