| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Defaults for replication/backup |
| Date: | 2016-02-13 15:17:38 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEwBLb5RCw7jNOH6kojos-WbzQLF6cVYrTrkUH3YG3r6Hw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-02-13 07:13:55 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I would like to add the idea of having archiving on by default. Not
> everyone
> > uses streaming replication, some people use PITR. The one that I see is
> > archive_command and I am not sure how to deal with that.
>
> Since that requires additional setup anyway, I don't really see a
> comparable effect of such a move.
>
Also, you can reasonably do PITR without using
archive_command/archive_mode. Just use pg_receivexlog...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-02-13 15:25:06 | Re: pg_basebackup vs WAL fetching |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-02-13 15:16:53 | Re: Defaults for replication/backup |