From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Does PGDG apt repository support ARM64? |
Date: | 2022-04-01 15:00:42 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEw-DPX_dtpZ7N3SBdp3v9=fNASqacMU3Qo9dUYnax6yvQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:52 PM Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 16:28, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > Stretch also goes end of life on June 30 2022, so just a few months
> away. You definitely shouldn't be using that.
>
> The platform is part of the Python binary packages build chain; they
> are purposely on the old side of the spectrum in order to create
> binaries which can work with as many Linux distributions as possible,
> making use of core libraries ABI compatibility. The rationale is
> available at https://peps.python.org/pep-0513/
Ah yeah, that makes sense. Then buster is likely the better choice, yeah.
(But you do want to get off stretch before it goes into unsupported land)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2022-04-01 15:08:27 | Re: Does PGDG apt repository support ARM64? |
Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2022-04-01 14:51:52 | Re: Does PGDG apt repository support ARM64? |