From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog |
Date: | 2012-05-10 14:43:37 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEw=CDieE5eFG7PJG8ME4XLgvRmR8gLOO6PvG6O9iQHo6w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Argh. This thread appears to have been forgotten - sorry about that.
>
> Given that we're taling about a potential protocol change, we really
> should resolve this before we wrap beta, no?
Had a chat with Heikki about this, and we came to the conslusion that
we don't actually have to fix it befor ebeta. Because pg_basebackup is
going to have to consider 9.1 servers anyway, and we can just treat
9.2beta1 as being a 9.1 from this perspective.
We still have to fix it, but it' snot as urgent :-)
FWIW, the main plan we're onto is still to add the GUCs on new
connections to walsender, so we have something to work with...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-05-10 14:44:17 | Re: Draft release notes complete |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-05-10 14:43:08 | Re: Can pg_trgm handle non-alphanumeric characters? |