Re: missing attachment in mails

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: cedric <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: missing attachment in mails
Date: 2013-08-17 16:15:34
Message-ID: CABUevEw+814SfEk7ZKf=4xkRGHmNZAHADHQfRMUsxNwcAFvwBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Le lundi 17 juin 2013 23:30:16, Cédric Villemain a écrit :
>> Le lundi 17 juin 2013 15:56:44, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
>> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Cédric Villemain
>> >
>> > <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > > Le mercredi 29 mai 2013 19:36:46, Stephen Frost a écrit :
>> > >> * Cédric Villemain (cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
>> > >> > I've search another example and found one from Stephen Frost (Sign +
>> > >> > attachment):
>> > >> >
>> > >> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130413030619.GN4361@tamriel.s
>> > >> > no wma n.net
>> > >> >
>> > >> > it contains an attachment not visible in the archive.
>> > >>
>> > >> Huh, neat. Yeah, this is the way mutt handles attachments, etc, and
>> > >> is pretty common (at least, among open source folks :). We should
>> > >> probably look into figuring out how to support it..
>> > >
>> > > I had no time to have a look at that.
>> > > CF is on its way but the mails linked from CF items don't contain
>> > > attachment...
>> > >
>> > > How can I help fixing that ?
>> >
>> > A good start would be to identify exactly when this happens. Not based
>> > on which MUA is used, but based on which types of messages. The first
>> > one on your list (the only one i have time to check right this moment
>> > - boarding a flight) is a multipart/signed containing a
>> > multipart/mixed for example - might it be that the problem lies in
>> > nested multipart or so?
>>
>> Correct, issue was that recursion entered only multipart/mixed, I've added
>> multipart/signed. See patch 0001.
>> I've also attached a patch to correct a typo.
>
> would you mind review this patch ?

Both look good, applied, thanks!

I've reparsed the specific messages you mentioned in this thread, but
I haven't gone back and reparsed all the historic ones (because I
don't know of a good way to identify them without scanning
everything). All new messages should parse fine though.

Apologies for the delay.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2013-08-19 19:58:52 Expanding "Upcoming Events" on the Homepage
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2013-08-17 14:33:55 Re: Searching 9.3beta documentation does not work