From: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jeremy Harris <jgh(at)wizmail(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PoC: Partial sort |
Date: | 2014-01-18 17:32:04 |
Message-ID: | CABRT9RDva32yHfar3iEHYuji2zyi-nAnTam4FAmxzoQGS83hgg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Funny, I just wrote a patch to do that some minutes ago (didn't see your
email yet).
Regards,
Marti
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Jeremy Harris <jgh(at)wizmail(dot)org> wrote:
> On 13/01/14 18:01, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
>> Thanks. It's included into attached version of patch. As wall as
>> estimation
>> improvements, more comments and regression tests fix.
>>
>
> Would it be possible to totally separate the two sets of sort-keys,
> only giving the non-index set to the tuplesort? At present tuplesort
> will, when it has a group to sort, make wasted compares on the
> indexed set of keys before starting on the non-indexed set.
> --
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-01-18 17:34:25 | Re: new json funcs |
Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2014-01-18 17:22:50 | Re: PoC: Partial sort |