From: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | sridhar bamandlapally <sridhar(dot)bn1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing ! |
Date: | 2012-01-27 09:06:14 |
Message-ID: | CABRT9RD_VXa4zEDVYoe4a0TgDFbidBC884q_2S47hyre_Sp9Sg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:31, sridhar bamandlapally
<sridhar(dot)bn1(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 7444K| 944M| 16077 (4)| 00:03:13 |
> | 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 7444K| 944M| 16077 (4)| 00:03:13 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry to take this off topic, but... Seriously, over 3 minutes to read
944 MB of data? That's less than 5 MB/s, what's wrong with your
database? :)
Regards,
Marti
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vitalii Tymchyshyn | 2012-01-27 09:19:25 | Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing ! |
Previous Message | sridhar bamandlapally | 2012-01-27 04:31:09 | Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing ! |